The Heroism As a Philosophical and Sociological Concept in Spatio-Temporal Dimension

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31857/S0236200724030036

Keywords:

hero, heroism, cyberhero, chronotope, post-modern chronotope, semiotic analysis, theory of social action, relational relation

Abstract

The article presents the results of an interdisciplinary study of heroism, in which philosophers and sociologists took part. The study consists of two stages — a theoretical understanding of heroism and an empirical pilot study of heroism in the assessment of Russians. This article is devoted to the coverage of the first, theoretical stage of the study. It presents a semiotic analysis of heroism from the point of view of the concept of the chronotope in Western European and Asian cultures, and deduces the constants of the national semantics of the hero, heroism and the heroic. The dynamics of changing the meanings of the heroic, deed and feat is traced. The sociological part, continuing the philosophical understanding of heroism within the framework of the chronotope concept, considers the phenomenon of heroism through a social relationship, following N.K. Mikhailovsky vector. To comprehend the relationship between the hero and the crowd, such sociological approaches as creative and relational theories of social action are used, the provisions of P. Donati's relational sociology are used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Oleg K. Shevchenko, Institute of Pedagogy, Psychology and Inclusive Education

    DSc in Philosophy, Professor of the Department of History and Philosophy

  • Mariia A. Podlesnaia, Institute of Sociology Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

    CSc in Sociology, Leading Researcher of Center for the Study of Russian Regions

Published

2024-09-17

Issue

Section

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH

How to Cite

[1]
2024. The Heroism As a Philosophical and Sociological Concept in Spatio-Temporal Dimension. Chelovek. 35, 3 (Sep. 2024), 44–62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S0236200724030036.